Direct Seed Research is
Important to Your Operation
 
By Russ Evans, PNDSA
 

During the WSU Cook Agronomy Farm dedication in June, Dr. Richard Smiley provided an overview of the significant events that transpired to bring the WSU agronomy farm from concept to reality. He emphasized the significant leadership role of Dr. Cook in these events; establishing research priorities, developing the research team and, most important, pulling together a lobby effort from the agriculture community that would secure the funding required to make the project viable.
Since its inception, the Cook Agronomy Farm has delivered outstanding value to the agriculture industry. The dedicated scientists and technicians, who make this happen year-in-year-out are the backbone of the operation. The strength of this backbone can be credited to two things; Dr. Cook’s leadership and the strong lobby effort that ensured funding was available to open the doors to an innovative and creative center for agriculture research.

During his presentation Dr. Smiley identified a disturbing trend in declining federal contributions to agriculture research in the Pacific Northwest. Throughout the past ten years, since the inception of the Cook Agronomy Farm, research funding for the farm has steadily declined. Now, in 2007, as the farm bill is debated, the Cook Agronomy Farm stands at the precipice – will there be enough to continue with a viable research program?

Budget uncertainty is a fact of life in the research community but the impact of continual budget cutting also cuts deep into the ability of a program to attract and keep high quality research scientists. Scientist that can see long term projects, such as are needed in the crop sciences, through to completion and publication.

We reported in the Summer 2007 Direct Seed Link Newsletter (pdf) of the funding situation for the STEEP program. The outcome for this program also remains uncertain and word is that other research programs are also anxiously awaiting confirmation of their future. On June 26, Dr. Smiley issued a renewed call for support from the agriculture community; a renewed lobby effort to establish a sound financial base to support important agriculture research resources.

Call your government representatives today and let them know how important direct seed agriculture research is to your operation. That call could be one of the best investments you can make this year.

 

Chaff, Stubble & Residue
UPDATE FROM
THE PRESIDENT ...........................2

Defending Carbon ....................3

New Carbon Offset Project ....4

Direct Seed Mentoring ............5

No(till) Comment .......................6

Direct Seed Events ....................6

PNDSA Membership
Information .................................6

www.directseed.org
Gets a New Look .......................6

PH: 208.883.3645
FX: 208.882.6406
2780 W. Pullman Road, Suite A
Moscow, ID 83843
http://www.directseed.org
PNDSA@directseed.org

 

PNDSA PRESIDENT UPDATE
CHAFF, STUBBLE & RESIDUE
Transitioning to Direct Seeding: The Time is Now

By Mark Sheffels

For most of us, 2007 was not a great production year, but below average production does not necessarily mean a bad year. When prices hit $8 for wheat things don’t look too bad. At this point it seems likely next year will also offer attractive prices.

Getting to the point, as a rabid proponent of Direct Seeding I would like to share some thoughts on how you might invest some of your good fortune, surprise, surprise. Often I’m told by farmers that they believe Direct Seeding is the future but the capital cost of becoming a Direct Seeder is daunting. Year to year survival is their only consideration. Changing production systems is a big decision, but when an opportunity like this comes along it is a good time to do some long term planning. The conservation benefits of Direct Seeding will make you biologically sustainable in the long run. The lower production cost of Direct Seeding will also better position you to be economically sustainable. If a couple years of strong prices make the initial capital investment possible, maybe now is the time to become a Direct Seeder.

I realize this article is being circulated mostly to producers that are already Direct Seeders, so I’m counting on you to share this thought with producers that have been telling you they think Direct Seeding is the future but they cannot afford to get into it. As veteran Direct Seeders refine and update their equipment needs, a lot of used Direct Seed drills and sprayers will go on the market. Let’s hope producers recognize our current good fortune as an opportunity to prepare for the future rather than breathing room to continue the inefficient process of multiple tillage production.

 

Defending Our
Carbon Assets

By Russ Evans, PNDSA

The people of Washington, DC have accepted the idea that there is the real possibility of significant climate change due to man-made production of green house gases (GHG). There are now many minds investing much effort to determine how to legislatively reduce the amount of GHG being released to the atmosphere. We will all eventually and in some way play a role in reducing the impact of GHG on our biosphere but the agriculture industry and our soil resources have an important role in this effort.
    From the standpoint of ecological impact, agriculture holds some interesting cards for a GHG reduction strategy. First, the most significant ecological damage caused by farming was done a century ago when most of land across this country was plowed. This land is not going back into its natural state any time soon. Nor should it; we all need to eat and in order to produce enough for us and some for those less fortunate (in our still expanding global population), agriculture needs to utilize modern technologies that require the consumption of fossil fuels in both their manufacturing and application processes.Science and technology are wonderful things when we put them to appropriate use and agriculture is a great example of this. Through the application of creativity, innovation and new technology, agriculture, through the adoption of direct seed cropping systems and precision agriculture technologies, has proven it can produce more product (no longer just food), at a lower cost and, simultaneously, reduce its ecological footprint. This is the direct result of investment into private and public research and the application of grower creativity and innovation.
   Through the application of science and technology all industries can reduce their ecological footprint to some extent. Agriculture, however, gets a bonus. Agriculture can both reduce its carbon emissions on per unit of production basis and also sequester and store carbon as a capital asset in the soil. I call this a capital asset because with it, your cropping system can retain and hold more water, more nutrients and more micro-biological life that will be drawn upon, as a dividend each year, to produce a higher, better quality yield. And, as with any good investment, not only does it pay a dividend it replenishes itself annually by reinvesting in more capital so dividends and capital continue to grow.
  The full value of this asset, from an ecological, societal or economic perspective, is difficult to measure. Society, however, seems determined to place a value on the carbon dioxide content equivalent (CO2e) that is contained within it. The agriculture community faces a daunting task to ensure ownership and the rights of ownership for this asset are retained within the agriculture sector.
   There are lobby efforts in Washington that argue that CO2e offsets that can be accrued in agriculture soils should either not be included as an allowable offset in GHG cap and trade legislation or severely limited in the price and quantity at which they are allowed to trade. This is generally a protectionist move to ensure that dollars from an industry stay within the industry. The lobbyists provide many reasons ranging from the ability of agriculture to provide offsets at a lower cost than many industries to the lack of ability of agriculture to provide measurable quantification of the actual offsets achieved. Agriculture has its work cut out for it to provide responses to these allegations but more than anything the agricultural community needs to stand together and defend the unencumbered ownership of an asset they invested in and maintain on an annual basis.

 

There is an abundance of information
on the web.
Checkout the links on our website www.directseed.org
and below are a few informative sites:

http://lieberman.senate.gov/documents/acsa.pdf

http://www.eurekalert.org/features/doe/2005
09/dnnl-lim091605.php


http://www.carbonoffsetsolutions.ca/

http://cdiac.ornl.gov/newsletr/summer00/monitor.htm

http://www.ars.usda.gov/is/pr/2005/050413.htm

http://www.ars.usda.gov/is/pr/2005/050422.htm



 

 

New Pilot Project for Carbon Offset Dollars

By Russ Evans, PNDSA

   In 2002, PNDSA developed and traded the first North American aggregated block of soil carbon offsets. The protocol used for this project would not meet today’s more stringent criteria that are developing as we get closer to the reality of cap and trade legislation. PNDSA is currently working on the development of new measurement, monitoring and verification (MMV) criteria that will be used for future contracts. Part of this protocol is being developed through the initiation of a pilot project that will aggregate emission reductions from efficiencies gained by the adoption of precision agriculture technologies. This will include practices like GPS auto steer on seeders and sprayers, variable rate fertilize application and green seeker technologies. The emission reductions are calculated based on the saving achieved from the more efficient application of fertilizer, pesticides and reduced fuel consumption. The pilot project will include approximately 25,000 acres aggregated into a package and marketed to an emissions offset buyer.
  
This is believed to be another first in carbon trading. Putting a pilot project like this together requires PNDSA to, once again, take a leadership role in pulling the appropriate information together and working through the permutations and combinations that will make the project work. PNDSA President Mark Sheffels, who was involved in the development of the first carbon trade, comments, “This is a very important role for a grower organization to initiate on behalf of its members. We know the results we get from this pilot project will be put forward in the best interest of our grower members. Our members will be the first to know of the pitfalls that may arise from being involved and also the full potential opportunity that may be available.” Sheffels concludes, “This is an important value this organization can provide its members. Not only is it expanding and creating opportunity, it continues to encourage the adoption of new technologies and innovations that reduce agriculture’s impact on the environment.”
    Details of the pilot project are still being finalized. As data from the project becomes available PNDSA will be using the information to support lobby efforts to keep agriculture included in future cap and trade legislation. The information generated by this project will also be incorporated into future soil carbon offset protocols that are in the works.


 

   
Try Before You Buy
Latah County Direct Seed Mentoring Project

 
If you are interested in participating in the Latah County Direct Seed Mentoring Project, either as a mentor or as a grower looking for direct seed information, please call Hans Kok at 208-885-5971 or e-mail him at hanskok@uidaho.edu
Early in August, Hans Kok, Conservation Tillage Extension Specialist at UI/WSU received news he was the recipient of an NRCS Conservation Innovation Grant for Idaho. The grant is a technology transfer opportunity to help Idaho farmers make the switch to a direct seed cropping system. The program will provide the opportunity for a farmer to have up to 100 acres direct seeded by an experienced direct seed farmer. It will also support follow-up consultation between the farmers in an effort to make the transition to direct seeding as seamless as possible.   The program is being called the Direct Seed Mentoring Project and is presented by UI extension, PNDSA and Latah County Soil and Water Conservation District. Hans Kok is the project leader.Hans has experience in this type of project from past work he was involved in and he comments “this is a great way for farmers to look at new systems with very little risk. We’ll pay an experienced direct seeder to come to your farm and seed up to 100 acres in a side by side comparison. The direct seed farmer will direct any pre-seed preparation that may be required on the test plot, seed the plot and then provide a couple of follow up visits to address any concerns that may arise as the crop develops.”
    As the price of commodities becomes more respectable it is a great opportunity for growers to look at a transition into a direct seed cropping system. The capital cost of new seeding equipment is always stated as a barrier. This program allows you to try before you buy. PNDSA’s role in the project is to find experienced direct seed mentors from its membership. Kyle Morscheck, PNDSA Vice President and Latah County grower suggests “we are going to try and find members that can provide a wide variety of drill options to the project. This would allow growers to select a mentor with a drill they feel would provide the best fit in their operation.” The direct seed mentors don’t necessarily need to come from within Latah County but travel distance of course will become an issue if they are too far away.
Implementation of the program begins this fall with finding mentors and participating growers. The comparison plots will be seeded next spring. “If everything works out” Hans Kok adds, “we’ll do more plots next fall. At this time we only have funding for Latah County Soil and Water Conservation District but I have had interest expressed from other conservation districts.”
 

 

No(till) Comment
By Russ Evans, PNDSA

    Over the summer we experienced what might be called a communications fiasco when a national ARS news release announced no-till doesn’t work in the PNW. Needless to say it took about a week for the email lines to cool off but all was soon put right. The truth was told: no-till does work in the PNW but spring wheat in the very dry regions is not always economical.
ARS apologized profusely, reprimanded the writer (who did not get the news release approved) and changed policy to ensure this type of error would not happen again. To tell the truth it was a rather exhilarating time: defending no-till, getting to the bottom of the report and gaining a better understanding of the research and those involved in the research. When the chaff settled and everyone was back in their pod, I began to wonder “What really happened here? How or why did this get reported this way? Why was there such a reaction to a statement that was so obviously wrong?” And many other questions that likely don’t have satisfactory answers.
Here is what I think. Dwayne Beck talks about the brain transplant required to successfully adopt direct seed cropping systems. In my experience those who have had the transplant have difficulty understanding what the rest of the community doesn’t see and have a very difficult time understanding why any resources whatsoever can still be dedicated to intensive tillage cropping systems. They believe all resources should be dedicated to gaining a greater understanding of how to make direct seed cropping systems (or as close to direct seed as possible) more successful so all growers can truly experience the benefits of direct seed.
Adoption of direct seed in the PNW is still in its early stages. There are some barriers and many perceived barriers that stand in the way of widespread adoption. This incident exposed a crack in these perceptions and prevailing attitudes. It also provided an opportunity to show that the voice for direct seed is stronger and louder than ever. It was an opportunity for the research, communications, extension and direct seed grower communities to unite in the development of a common message/ language that will ensure adoption of direct seed cropping systems continues at a growing pace.


 

DIRECT SEED EVENTS

Efficient Use of Resources
2008 Direct Seed Cropping Systems Conference
January 23 & 24, 2008 Three Rivers Convention Center, Kennewick, WA

The 2008 Conference theme is ‘Efficient Use of Resources’ and depending on your perspective this will conjure up different images and provide a wide range of topics that can be covered. Ultimately, all industries try to use available resources in the most efficient way possible. This is economically, environmentally and socially responsible.
This is why direct seed makes so much sense; it is economically efficient, environmentally beneficial and socially responsible as it provides more product at a lower cost with less environmental impact. Of course, our delegates to the 2008 conference already know this. So, what are the limits of agriculture production efficiency? What are the key issues? And, how can you increase efficiency on your farm? The 2008 conference will attempt to answer these questions and more. We’ll look at minimizing your carbon foot print, precision fertilizer placement, pest/weed management strategies, energy consumption and production balances, opportunities in precision agriculture and much more. It’s not mandatory to attend but just think what you might miss if you don’t.
Check your calendar. We are a little later this year, January 23 and 24, 2008. See you in Kennewick.
For more information visit: www.directseed.org/conference.html or contact
PNDSA at (208) 883-3645.
You can also email conference@directseed.org

Clearwater Direct Seeders
Breakfast Meetings
October 23, 2007 January 15, 2008
November 20, 2007 February 12, 2008
December 11, 2007 March 4, 2008
Red Lion Hotel, Lewiston, ID

Everyone is welcome to attend Tuesday mornings at 7 a.m. for a sponsored breakfast at the Red Lion in Lewiston. Speakers address topics of interest to direct seeders and those interested in moving towards direct seeding. Farmers, University scientist and industry speakers have been featured in the past. Topics are set by the group. Contact Hans Kok (hanskok@uidaho.edu) or Dennis Roe (rdroe@wsu.edu) for more information or to be added to the mailing list.

Direct Seed 101
Transitioning from Intensive Tillage to Direct Seed
Thursday, February 7, 2008 - 7:30 a.m. to 10:00 a.m.
$15 fee includes Breakfast and Spokane Ag Expo Admission

Invite your banker, landlord and neighbors to find out more about moving from an intensive tillage system to a direct seed system.
Dr. John Baker, developer of the cross slot opener will provide the keynote presentation followed by a grower panel that will discuss their agro-climatic challenges, their cropping system and why they made the transition to direct seeding.
This session is jointly presented by Spokane County Conservation District (SCCD) and PNDSA. For information or to register contact Russ at PNDSA (208) 883-3645 or email PNDSA@directseed.org or Rich or Jim at SCCD (509) 535-7274.


Check out our new look at
www.directseed.org

We have remodeled and updated the PNDSA web site. It should now be easier to navigate and all the links should be working. More information will be added to the web site as it becomes available.
Let us know if you come across something that does not work lik you think it should. Your comments and suggestions are always welcome.

Comments can be emailed to:
PNDSA@directseed.org

Yearly membership contribution to the
Pacific Northwest Direct Seed Association provides support for ...

Delivering the Pacific Northwest Direct Seed Conference.
Members take advantage of reduced conference fees.

Peer support for growers developing their direct seed cropping systems.

Input to research throughout the Pacific Northwest.

Representation to government on policy and program
development that effect the environment and direct seed
growers.

Your source for the latest information and research on
direct seed cropping systems.

 

There are many ways to contribute:

PNDSA Member or Associate Member $100 per year
PNDSA Lifetime Member $1500 1 time contribution
PNDSA Supporter ($250 - $2,499 per year)
PNDSA Partner (Starting at $2,500 per year)
PNDSA Board Member (4 meetings per year)
Participate in a Working Group
Contribute Financially to the Legislative Fund
Make a Donation to support ongoing activities.

More information at
www.directseed.org/membership.html

Click Here for PNDSA Membership Form.pdf


Renew your membership today and get
$70 SAVINGS
on registration fees at the
2008 Direct Seed Conference Registration Form.pdf

     
Thank you Direct Seed Lifetime Members for your ongoing support.

John Aeschliman

R. James Cook
Washington State University

Rob and John Dewald
Dewald Farms

Karl Felgenhauer
Elden Felgenhauer Farms

Hal R. Johnson
Mondovi Corner Farm Inc.

Richard Koster
Koster Farm

Karl Kupers
K & J Farms Inc.

Steve Mader

 

Tim Melville

James R. Nollmeyer
Nollmeyer Farms JV

Roland Schirman

Mark Sheffels
Sheffels Co.

Gerald and Angelene Stubbs
Stubbs Farms LLC

Wes Wagner
Agra Inc.

Don and Doug Wellsandt
Wellsandt Farms

Dick Wittman

Russ Zenner